Flow state 2.0: Unleashing next level peak performance
There’s a moment when the world falls away. A moment when action feels effortless, time dissolves, and and our inner critic quiets. This is the elusive and powerful state known as flow. First identified by psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi in the 1970s, flow has since become a cornerstone of peak performance research. It’s the state where effort becomes invisible and where the quality of experience reaches its most optimal form.
Flow shows up in many places: in an athlete lost in motion, a dancer moving with instinct, a writer channeling ideas with ease, or a scientist chasing the contours of an idea into uncharted territory. But not all flow states are created equal. Recent research has begun to illuminate that there is more than one flavor of flow. Specifically, creative flow and kinesthetic flow—two seemingly similar experiences—may in fact be driven by different cognitive and neurological mechanisms. Understanding those differences is key to mastering them both.
Creative Flow
Creative flow is the state that artists, writers, entrepreneurs, and scientists often find themselves in during bouts of inspired ideation. It is an internal experience, fueled by ideas, imagination and cognitive flexibility.
Unlike other forms of flow, creative flow is often nonlinear. It doesn’t follow a clear path from point A to B. One idea suggests another. A problem opens a hidden door. Thoughts leap, skip, and shuffle, pulling together connections from disparate parts of the brain. This type of thinking relies on cognitive flexibility—the ability to move between concepts, reframe challenges, and adapt strategies on the fly. In this realm, ambiguity is not an obstacle. It’s the fuel.
This is not the kind of focus that narrows. Creative flow expands. It pulls from memory, emotion, and environment. The focus is directed inward, and while the body may remain still, the mind is leaping across chasms of thought.
Kinesthetic Flow
Kinesthetic flow, by contrast, is rooted in the physical. It is the state of optimal performance during physical action—whether sprinting down a field, landing a jump, or navigating a trail on two wheels. This version of flow is highly embodied, requiring harmony between intention and action, and is often practiced and refined over time.
Unlike the cognitive wanderings of creative flow, kinesthetic flow thrives on structure. Goals are clearly defined. Feedback is immediate and external. Hit the target. Land the move. Finish the run. Success is visible, often measurable.
And because it is physically demanding, kinesthetic flow engages a different network of brain systems. It relies less on abstract reasoning and more on sensorimotor processing. Attention is directed outward. Eyes track motion. Muscles respond to terrain. Time dilates, but awareness sharpens. There’s a beautiful paradox at work: the better the body is trained, the more it disappears into the background, allowing performance to surface unimpeded.
The Science of Flow
Both creative and kinesthetic flow involve a kind of cognitive unhooking—a quieting of the inner critic, a release from self-monitoring. But how they achieve this varies. Neuroscientists have discovered that both forms involve a temporary reduction in activity in the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s executive center. This phenomenon, called transient hypofrontality, helps explain why people in flow lose their sense of time and self. But while the broad mechanism may be similar, the inputs and outputs differ dramatically.
In creative flow, the brain recruits networks associated with memory, emotion, and associative thinking. This makes sense—creativity depends on forming connections, which often arise when traditional constraints are lifted. Emotional states also play a unique role. Positive moods, even subtle ones, have been shown to broaden thinking and support more original idea generation.
Yet both demand the same quality of immersion. In both cases, distractions vanish. The flow experience, whether internal or external, draws full engagement. And in both cases, people emerge from flow changed—, clarified, and often surprised by what they’ve accomplished.
The Chemistry of Flow
Behind the scenes, both forms of flow ride a wave of neurochemistry. Dopamine, the molecule of motivation and reward, spikes as challenges are met and surpassed. Norepinephrine sharpens focus. Endorphins mute discomfort. Anandamide—the “bliss molecule”—contributes to mood and pattern recognition. And serotonin, often released post-flow, stabilizes mood and reinforces a sense of satisfaction.
Yet the triggers for these chemical cascades differ. Physical exertion, common in kinesthetic flow, directly activates the body’s endocannabinoid and opioid systems. This explains why runners, cyclists, and dancers often report a euphoric high after long sessions of motion. In creative flow, emotional engagement and novelty play bigger roles. The brain lights up in response to the thrill of insight, the pleasure of novelty, and the deep satisfaction of meaningful work.
When Flow States Converge
These moments—where the boundaries blur—point to a powerful synergy. Physical flow can prepare the brain for creative flow. Moving the body through space can silence the mind, clearing a path for ideas. Many writers and innovators report breakthroughs while walking, running, or gardening. Likewise, creative flow can shape physical flow. Visualization, storytelling, and inner dialogue all influence how we move and perform.
Understanding the differences between creative and kinesthetic flow isn’t just an academic exercise. It has real-world implications for how we train, work, and live. For those in creative fields, engaging the body in rhythmic, challenging movement can set the stage for deeper mental breakthroughs. For athletes, cultivating space for curiosity, imagination, visualization, and innovation can unlock new levels of performance.
Leaders, educators, and coaches can use this knowledge to design experiences that align challenge with skill, whether the goal is to build endurance or ignite innovation. The conditions for flow—clear goals, immediate feedback, and a balance between ability and difficulty—are universal. But how they’re applied depends on the domain.
Equally important is the ability to recover and reset. Flow may feel effortless, but it consumes energy. Periods of deep absorption must be balanced with rest, reflection, and recalibration. When integrated wisely, both forms of flow can become reliable engines of progress and transformation.
The Takeaway: Know Your Flow, Grow Your Potential
We are not wired for constant output. But we are wired for depth. Whether in the silence of the studio or the noise of the field, flow is our brain’s way of signaling that we’re on the right track—that we are using ourselves fully, with skill, intent, and grace.
By understanding the difference between the cognitive pulse of creative flow and the physical rhythm of kinesthetic flow, we gain new tools for navigating both work and life. The writer can learn from the sprinter. The dancer can borrow from the inventor. In doing so, we move closer to that rare and rewarding territory where effort fades, awareness deepens, and we meet ourselves at our very best.
Ready to unlock your potential?
Sign up for Create Potential’s free mailing list to access exclusive, science-backed resources — and discover how creativity and flow state can help you thrive.
-
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Perennial.
Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving.
Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in Sports. Human Kinetics.
Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance. PLoS One.
Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization.
Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for an upward spiral. Journal of Happiness Studies.
Sparling, P. B., et al. (2003). Exercise activates the endocannabinoid system.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist.
van der Linden, D., Tops, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). The neuroscience of the flow state. Frontiers in Psychology.